Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 06:47
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ethane Exporter Says U.S. Won’t Allow Shipments to China - WSJ
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
NASCAR Saturday schedule at Pocono Raceway - NBC Sports
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
How to draft a will to avoid becoming an AI ghost—it’s not easy - Ars Technica
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Costco makes key moves to protect prices from tariffs - TheStreet
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What do people aim for when they meditate, and how do they do it properly?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The #1 Spice to Help You Poop, According to Dietitians - EatingWell